Accessibility Statement
What we aim for, what we have not verified, and how to tell us something is broken. Last updated 26 August 2026.
What we are aiming for
We build this site to meet the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.1 at Level AA as a working target. That means readable text sizes, sufficient colour contrast, semantic headings in a logical order, visible focus states, keyboard-operable links and form fields, labelled inputs, and text alternatives for meaningful images.
Choices we made deliberately
Body text never drops below 17 pixels and line length is capped so paragraphs stay readable. Content is left-aligned rather than justified. We do not use carousels, autoplaying media, motion that cannot be stopped, or text baked into images.
What we have not done
We have not commissioned a third-party audit and we do not claim formal conformance or certification. Nobody has tested every page with every screen reader and browser combination. Where the reference above says target, it means target.
Known limitations
The introductory section uses light text over a photograph. We apply an overlay to hold contrast, but if you find any part of it hard to read, tell us and we will darken it further.
If you use a high-contrast mode or override page colours, our paper background and hairline rules may render differently than intended.
Telling us about a barrier
Email [Contact email] with the page and what went wrong, and include the assistive technology and browser you were using if you know it. Accessibility reports are treated the same way as evidence corrections: they get fixed rather than filed. We aim to respond within two business days.
Getting the content another way
If any page on this site is unusable for you, ask and we will send the same content as plain text or in another format you can read.